fulltilt vs pokerstars

[Defaulted]

I prefer FTP by a long shot.

[spcsinger21]

Anybody that likes FTP has to be a donk. Im sorry but that site has horrible suck outs and the worst runner runners.

[DHIII]

i started out playing on pokerstars, gotta stay loyal. but full tilt has its positives with the pros. but over all id say pokerstars takes it....SUNDAY MILLIONS!!!

[Alacran]

I like FTP, but that site has a lot of newbies who think that poker is a gambling game like roulette or slots, and they go all in when they get the chance. But it has its advantages, like the Cap Tables, which are very pleasant to play in.

I've never used Poker Stars.

[Defaulted]

It's quite annoying when the whole table goes all in on the first hand in FTP, I must admit.

[Vivo222]

I like pokerstars, but the freerolls take forever. FTP is great. How come nobody talks about poker.com? I love to play there!!

[kchoya]

Absolute is my favorite, but I use FTP and PS occasionally.

[MoreCowbell32]

I think its hilarious when people think that one site has more bad beats or more suck-outs than the other. Neither of these sites are rigged! Both have fair poker play. If there is a prefference I hope its for better reasons than you think you will win more on one than other. Because you have an equal chance at both.

[scoogie_scott]

I only use Fulltilt, but sometimes i sure do notice that river card coming out and beating me a lot. i often wonder if i should try a different site.

[NosliwPilf]

full tilt for sure