fulltilt vs pokerstars

i deffinitely say poker stars for me. they have alot more games to play and good range. full tilt always is not responding on me and dissconnects , they dont have as many games.

[pkshooter10]

Have to go with FTP as ive had an unpleasant experience with pokerstars resulting in me playing there less often mainly railbirds or pokercast freerolls only although not as many bingo players on PS as on FTP. FTP has Phil Ivey, PS has the ANNOYING Negraneau and you cant get much worse unless you watch Jamie Gold .

I want a site where 70% or more see the flop. That makes things fun.

[kidflopadelic]

I've played a bunch on both and I prefer FT because of their superior interface, graphics, options, features. BUT...we all pay for these things too, because of FT's fatter rake. PS has a cheaper rake but lower quality graphics and options, but more players at the tables.
So I prefer playing on FT more often, but if PS wants to blow my balance up a few thousand bucks, I'll hang out there for awhile!

full tilt seems to be the most balanced

Full tilt - Gotta hate the dealer! Too many suckouts, its unreal. But I'm stuck with ft now so ..

i cant play on pokestars. the tables are really ugly and the freroll too hard

I prefer Full tilt. I lost to much money on pokerstars due to idiots.

i'd have to go with stars even tho they are my 2 fav's but the game selsection on stars is better imo . i love 2-7 if tilt got that then maybe id switch and stars also has a lot more for less

i agree tilt is better because ppl play more real rather than calling everythin and catching somethin on the river