2008-08-04 - Shown cards

[railbird]

2008-08-04 - Shown cards

Very interesting quiz question...I would say it's a very close call between the two bets...is the smaller bet more likely to be interpreted as a suck bet and get called? Or would the all-in be more likely to be interpreted as a bluff and get the call? In reality, you'd really have to think about your history with this particular opponent. I'm not familiar with either player enough for that to be a factor for me--was this an actual hand? If so, what did Hennigan actually do?

But certainly you're going to bet! Why on earth would you check when you KNOW WITHOUT A DOUBT you have the best hand?????? If any of the people who answered check would care to enlighten me on their thought process, I'd love to hear it!

I Dont Know What Chuck Was Drinking But Maybe He Should Lay Off Until After The Game. Why Would Anybody Show Their Cards For No Reason. And Yes I Would Bet It All Knowing I Had The Best Hand

he isn't calling all in... bet 2.5 is correct, which isn't a listed choice

i don't know why but i said check, i figured he'd think i didn't have a hand. did you notice the pattern, he started with the beating i called or i checked. this is being a little passive, but he's sure to bet. i don't think he'll call if i bet. he wants to be in control and arrogant why else would he show his hand. check check check check check!!!!

[kctcjo]

that explanation as to why my value bet was wrong was so unintelligible im baffled. quizzy must have been drinking when he wrote it.

[1stKngBlckSldg]

I got correct again. Doing well so far.


Good luck on the tables!

Well my thinking is that he is aggressive and arrogant and if I check he will bet anyway. I would like him to hang himself I guess. But after reading quizzy's reasoning the mid bet probably makes more sense. I do love the daily quiz. Keep them coming

i go all in becuse he will think that i am bluffing

I went all--my thinking was a push would make him consider that I was bluffing and induce a call.