limit or no-limit

No Limit cuz ur more likely to win big or lose big

fixed limit is good but ppl just call down to the river with anything hoping to get lucky

no-limit, of course. I also like limit but higher-stakes. In low limit stakes, people are always sucing you out because they don't give a f**k, wish mean you can easly get your big ppocket cracked. In no-limit, you have all the looseness to protect your cards and win big pot by a bluff wish is more harder in limit because it's less about bluffs and more about good cards.

easily no limit...nothing beats the thrill of playing no limit poker having all your chips on the table

Agree with the comment above. Many would be in it until the river with mediocre to horrible hands in limit. NL raising or betting high amounts forces people to fold down their hands and allows for better poker.

Pros and cons to both. In limit, people will call you with AnyTwoCards and usually suck out. On the other and, your losses aren't as great (hopefully) because, as he name implies, it s limit.

NL is also good, bec you can (hopeflly, again) price out the chasers.

That said, having lived in Vegas for 6 mos and itching to go back ASAP, people go to Vegas w/a set amount of money they have for 'gambling' and they will 'gamble' oftentimes with AnyTwoCards, since they never expected to win, anyway. Tourist mindset is a definate problem when playing in big gaming detinations Local cardrooms in non gaming locales such as mall dog tracks in FL. People don't go to 'gamble'

i do prefer no limit but i disagree with most of what is said about limit poker. i think it just takes a different approach and thought process to play, especially if your strictly a no limit player. the best thing about limit poker for me is that your forced to play more flops and post flop because you cant shove in and take down the pot.

No limit way to many chasers in limit. No way to push out the draws.

limit poker of any varience is the worst poker ever, theres absolutely no skill involved, its just pure luck

I like limit. It's easier to take chips of the no limit players that try to play the same cards as they would in no limit. They fail to play the good drawing hands and will fold when holding them and play the pair's that they should be folding.

I actually like playing limit, but don't very often due to the Any Two carders as mentioned previously. The problem as I see it is people used to no-limit see limit as slow and figure that since they won't loose their whole stack chasing they chase away hoping to get that lucky card.

I love both but prefer limit, since it is easier to see more flops with a wide variety of hands without becoming too commited to a pot. I prefer to play flops then whole cards and this is easier to do in limit. GL2U!

I stick to only NoLimit play. I like the game alot and prefer the strategy & thinking involved in it far more than Limit,... levels of thinking in it can be endless.