My railbird time: 

Members:
Members online:
Members in chat:
65779
648
0
Railbirds Tournaments:
Next freeroll: 2 h, 3 m
All tournaments

Railbird Interviews
Use a Railbird anner on your homepage

Rakeback deals

Full Tilt 27%
$600/100%
Betfair 30-37%
$1500/100%
DTDPoker 30%
$450/100%
Opoker 30%
$450/100%
Betsafe 30%
$500/100%
Poker Heaven 30%
$750/100%
Fortune Poker 30%
$1500/200%
FatBet Poker 50%
$0/0%
UltimateBet 30%
$1100/111%
Absolute 30%
$500/100%
CakePoker 33%
$500/100%
High5Action 20-60%
$6500/100%
Minted Poker 35%
$400/100%
PKR.com 30%
$600/100%
Action Poker 35%
$2500/100%
PayNoRake 50-100%
$0/0%
PokerNordica 30%
$400/200%
IronDuke 30%
$300/100%

Bonus deals

Everest $5000/month
$300/500%
Chili Poker $600/150%
$600/150%
RedKings PS3 & Fifa 09
$400/2000%
Goal Win $2000 bonus
$2000/2000%
Betsson 30GB iPod
$0/0%

Special deals

Pacific Poker
$100/25%
LuckyAce Poker Pokerbility
$400/100%
Littlewoods Poker Loyalty Program
$400/100%
Propaganda Loyalty Bonus
$600/200%

Full Tilt vs. Poker Stars

Nov 3, 2008 3:21 am Report Abuse

Well I've always played Full tilt until today when i downloaded poker stars so i can play those freerolls as well. So far i prefer Full tilt, but that could very well be because its what ive used for about 2 years. Which do you prefer and why?


10 comments


Login to add comment...

famous5ives Nov 3, 2008 3:28 am
i like the tournament schedule and hi volume of pokerstars
Philme Nov 3, 2008 3:29 am
Well i play all of them but will be honest when it comes to horrific bad beats and its topped off at #1 POKERSTARS. I absolutley hate the runner runner and also runner runner runner cards that always come its sick. Like no other site out there but they have the most variety of games to choose from. If ur controlled u can learn aloot from playin badbeat sites cause of the discipline that must come with folding some of the best hands out there. I also love Carbon Poker which is an all around site
bj2207 Nov 3, 2008 3:46 am
I play on both, but much more on Full Tilt as I find it easier to build a bank roll from scratch there....and the fact that I blew a roll I had built up to $900+ plus on PS and only have $0.53 left now. On FT I have built from 0 to about $80 in the last few weeks, having never made a deposit there. Whatever you do....good luck to you on and off the felt.
REGULATOR0 Nov 3, 2008 3:46 am
i love them both!
NickPeters Nov 3, 2008 3:54 am
personally i love FTP. i started at pstars and also had a decent bankroll and then day after day after day of bad beats and i hated it. FTP yeah you get some donks but i feel as a community there are lot more skilled players and not as many donks waiting to go all in with bottom pair and hitting a runner runner straight or flush and whatever else they may hit.
KevGuy Nov 3, 2008 4:12 am
they are both the best poker sites hands down. I prefer Tilt because the graphics are amazing.
skittles Nov 3, 2008 4:21 am
I use both. and they both have things that i like and dislike about them. Honestly, i play on tilt more, basically out of habit, i have been with them longer and have gotten to know more of the players there.
JUMPY Nov 3, 2008 5:12 am
Itis so simple ... I prefer the one I am winning on .

Kidding , actually Stars has better / more tourneys and tilt has better ring games IMO.
tim4u Nov 3, 2008 5:27 am
the bigger fields on stars,, the easier to use tilt,,,like both for differant things,,,,i miss party,,,won big there but USA players arnt welcome anymore
tony9090 Nov 4, 2008 12:30 am
I prefer pokerstars more because I have been playing that for about one and a half years now. I have tried fulltilt but for the tournament schedules and the amount of players, i think pokerstars is better. Pokerstars has a wide range of tourneys and the amount of people registered is a lot and that makes the playing feel larger, the competition larger, and prize pool larger.

Login on Railbirds


© Copyright 2009