My railbird time: 

Members:
Members online:
Members in chat:
63806
660
21
Railbirds Tournaments:
Next tournament: 1 h, 39 m
All tournaments

Railbird Interviews
Use a Railbird anner on your homepage

Rakeback deals

Full Tilt 27%
$600/100%
Betfair 30-37%
$1500/100%
DTDPoker 30%
$450/100%
Opoker 30%
$450/100%
SunPoker 30%
$500/100%
Betsafe 30%
$500/100%
Poker Heaven 30%
$750/100%
Fortune Poker 30%
$1500/200%
FatBet Poker 50%
$0/0%
UltimateBet 30%
$1100/111%
Absolute 30%
$500/100%
CakePoker 33%
$500/100%
High5Action 20-60%
$6500/100%
Minted Poker 35%
$400/100%
PKR.com 30%
$600/100%
Action Poker 35%
$2500/100%
PayNoRake 50-100%
$0/0%
PokerNordica 30%
$400/200%
IronDuke 30%
$300/100%

Bonus deals

Everest $5000/month
$300/500%
Chili Poker $600/150%
$600/150%
RedKings PS3 & Fifa 09
$5000/%1000
Goal Win $2000 bonus
$2000/2000%
Betsson 30GB iPod
$0/0%

Special deals

Pacific Poker
$100/25%
LuckyAce Poker Pokerbility
$400/100%
Littlewoods Poker Loyalty Program
$400/100%
Betway VIP Program
$0/0%
Purple Lounge VIP Program
$1000/100%
BetOnBet VIP Program
$500/100%
Propaganda Loyalty Bonus
$600/200%
CarlosPoker
$600/100%

I ask again - why do straights beat 3-of-a-kind

Jul 7, 2008 12:47 am Report Abuse

When I originally joined this site, I asked why is it that straights beat 3-of-a-kind?

In my own experience, I see far many straights than 3-of-a-kind. Hence my silly question: If 3-of-a-kind are harder to get than straights, why do straights beat them?

I guessed I wished for some statisticians to prove whatever result. But, so far, to no avail.

So, I repeat myself: My experience has shown me that there are far many occasions odfstraights than of 3-of-a-kind.

Am I the only only one who think that 3-of-a-kind should be straights? And, if not, can someone explain to me why not? I am not convinced, sorry...



74 comments


Login to add comment... Sort order

topcat1954 Jul 7, 2008 12:57 am

Because a straight is a 5 card hand, and 3 of a kind isn't, it has two dead cards!

......play on ..Tc.....

Darloup Jul 7, 2008 1:03 am

Sorry, this does not prove anything from a statistical point of view... If you play regularly, you'll have to admit that you've seen far many straights than 3-of-of-a-kind. I know I have...

cozman Jul 7, 2008 1:03 am
yah easy way id what TC says
cozman Jul 7, 2008 1:04 am

pokers a 5 card game not a 3 card game

topcat1954 Jul 7, 2008 1:06 am

If it is numbers you need to convince you, how about these : For you to hit a set with a pocket pair, you are at 11%, to hit 3 cards in sequence to match with the 2 you hold, is 3.5%, so that is about 3 times as hard, by the numbers !

......play on ...tc........

Markie141 Jul 7, 2008 1:06 am
The odds of getting them are very close actually stat wise , but a straight is indeed a 5 card hand and the best 5 card hand wins , not the best 3 or 2 card hand , gl
Darloup Jul 7, 2008 1:07 am

So what? I challenge anyone telling me that, whilst playing, he saw more 3-of-a-kind than straights.

Markie141 Jul 7, 2008 1:09 am
lol ok , maybe you don't want to be convinced by silly little things like stats , either way a straight still beats a set , gl
Darloup Jul 7, 2008 1:11 am

A straight, as we all know, is indeed a 5-card hand but with MANY possibities: a card at the bottom, a card at the top, or even a card in-between...

I'm just asking you one thing: From your own experience in playing, don't you also get the feeling that you've seen far many straights than 3-of-a-kind?

MartyJr2 Jul 7, 2008 1:14 am
If you want the "numbers reason" why, you can take my basic statistics course the next time I teach it or you can see it worked out on this site (first one that came up on a google search for "probability poker hands":
http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~ramsey/Probability/PokerHands.html
Darloup Jul 7, 2008 1:15 am

Of course I want to be convinced - either way!

I only wished I could see the actual computed stats

Tilt_Poker Jul 7, 2008 1:16 am

Flopping a set or better (with a pocket pair) - 7.5/1 (11.8%)

Trips (using one of your pocket cards) from two non-pair cards - 73/1 or a little above 1%.

A straight from an open-ended straight draw on the next card 17%.

theres some odds for you ,and even getting a straight on a gutshot draw is 8%.

But the odds of flopping a straight are a little above 1% which is wayy less then floping a set with 2 pocket pairs (11%) and even getting trips with only 1 of your pocket pair cards is about 1% too. So it may be easier to draw out if you have a straight draw then to get trips but its a lot easier to get trips on the flop then the river


countrymum.au Jul 7, 2008 1:18 am

poker is made up of 5 cards you have to have 5 cards

example:

your hand is: kc ks

bored: Kh 2c 3s 4c Ac

you have 3 kings with Ac and 4c to make your 5 cards

were as the person with the st8 has a better 5 card

hope this helps

Darloup Jul 7, 2008 1:19 am

Again, I ask the same question: Don't tell me that, frm your experience, you've seen more 3-of-a-kind than straights... Well, have you?

rubslotionskin Jul 7, 2008 1:20 am
i think you see more straights because more people chase gut shots open ended........most players wont chase their trip draw with bottom or middle pair......with a straight draw a person is more inclined to chase........
AZZJACC Jul 7, 2008 1:24 am
I think all of one color, like black or red should bet a pair. But a guy named Hoyle didn't but that in his book either.
tablerobber Jul 7, 2008 1:26 am
online yes but in live play you will see 3 of a kind alot more
Scotteh99 Jul 7, 2008 1:35 am
ok hard facts even if your right your wrong thats the rules eh! so no matter what anyone say here it doesn't matter ... but I believe why you don't see more IS most people won't play small pocket pairs when raised before the flop.. IF EVERYONE with EVERY POCKET PAIR played them no matter the rasie or all ins before the flop U would see more trips sets etc, BUT it's poker and people lay down huge hands before flop because of players betting b4 the flop... in freerolls and play chips you see more trips/sets as people aren't scare to lose for free eh!
BarMeister Jul 7, 2008 1:38 am
The reason you see more straights than three of a kinds is that the people with the trips fold them when they know they are beaten by a straight....hence you only see the straights and not the trips that got thrown into the muck.
jp5457 Jul 7, 2008 1:40 am
I believe the reason, although you may see more straights than trips, is because of the probability of hitting your cards.

I have a weird analogy for part of the problem it may be confusing but its what I came up with. But first of all lets look at this!

If you are dealt AK. And you are looking at trips you have three ways of getting this. Either 2 A's, 2 K's or 3 of any other card. Now if you are looking for a straight you must hit three cards not matter what. Plus you can hit trips with any cards on the board! So your odds have increased slightly because the fact that you only need to hit two cards instead of three, along with the fact that you must hit 1 of four cards 3 separate times to complete the straight. (That is why many pros put value in hands like j10, 89, 65. They increasing the chances of hitting a straight because they dont need three specific cards they can use a number of different cards to complete the straight. However they do still need to hit 1 in 4 three times. instead of 1 in 3 twice.
Now the board tripping up has the same chance as hitting the straight for the same reason. You would have to hit three cards in order to make your hand.

Maybe this will be easier. I am just setting up the flop nothing more.
9 10 Suited you only have to hit two cards to catch trips a 2 percent chance of hitting trips on the flop
The straight is 3 cards so your left about a 1 percent chance.
There is a formula you can use. I have to re think about it but I will get it to you when I do. there are also a lot more ways to complete trips than to complete a straight along with the fact you only need three cards for trips but need 5 for a straight. So your odds of hitting diminish there.

Now as far as you seeing more.
Lets look at it this way: I live in Louisiana so you would expect that I would see more Louisiana License plates. And for most people in LA that would be correct. Therefore the chances of picking a car at random that has LA plates is lets say 8 out of 10. However I live 5 minutes from the Texas border therefore my chances of seeing a LA plate drop to 5 out of 10. Does that mean that every person in LA should change there stats? What about someone living on the border of three states and in a major city connected to a major highway. They are looking at maybe 2 out of 10 but overall a person in LA will see a LA plate 8 out of every 10 times.
This is just to show that one person may see many more things than another. I for one see a lot more flushes than straights. So you might see more of one thing but that does not mean it is easier to obtain in the long run.

Showing page: 1 / 4

Login on Railbirds


© Copyright 2008