I have by and large always been quite timid with regards to multi-tabling. Though I have done two tables with some success in cash games, I am not for the most part a cash game player, ergo I am not for the most part a multi-tabler.
This is all in the process of changing. I have been in a bit of a rut for a while now (not a losing streak per say, more of a breaking even streak), and having been looking to change something up to get me out of the rut. I tried dropping levels, to build my confidence, but it was only a temporary fix and after a couple of days, I was back to my old habits. Then I tried trying out a whole new game (draw), which while fun, left me feeling unfullfilled (I really want to become a better hold'em player before branching out, and I also feel like draw doesn't have as many opportunities long term).
So after reading about one player's exploits I decided I was going to take on multi-tabling. The first step was getting a decent monitor; I was surprised at how little it cost actually.
I came up with a plan that I would drop down to the lowest STT pokerstars has, and begin adding one table at a time; my end goal is to be playing four.But for right now I am stil adjusting to playing two. There have been a few times its gotten hectic, but I feel pretty confident that I will be able to add the third in a couple days.
By far the greatest benefit I have noticed since starting this is that when things don't go my way, either from bad beats or just bad plays, I am not nearly as affected by it. Further the fact I am getting twice as many games in means that it is far less likely I'll have a day that's a total loss - something that can really bring me down and affect my future play. This should only get better as I add the third and fourth table.
One thing I was very surprised at was that I couldn't find a lot of articles online about multi-tabling, or perhaps more correctly I couldn't find any that were very useful. It seems that every article about multi-tabling follows one of three outlines:
- Here are the most basic obvious things about multi-tabling
- Multi-tabling is the best thing ever.
- Multi-tabling is a waste of time. You will lose money by doing it.
In some ways I find it odd reading the opposing viewpoints mentioned in articles 2 and 3; not odd because they are opposing, but odd becaue 3 is full of the very thoughts that have kept me from multi-tabling for two years (though I unlike most of these authors, I always aknowledged that other people do make it work), while a toned down version of 2 is what I am really trying to make my mindset now.
One thing I couldn't help wonder reading these articles is why no one had any evidence other than their own experience; has no one ever looked into this topic in depth? Considering how common it is, I would have expected it.
Just to close things off here, if anyone knows of any articles or books that cover multi-tabling in depth, I would appreciate being pointed to them. Thanks.
3 comments
Boiled down, multi tabling loses the nuances of the game. Works if u r getting cards, suks if u have no time to pay attention to table image, position, stacks, bubble, who are donks and maniacs etc.
He he he.
I sometimes multi-table, and sometimes don't. My reasoning behind it is all based on what else I am doing. I love watching TV shows on my computer, browsing the net, whatever else you can think of, while i'm playing one tourney or SNG. If I decide I want to focus 100% on poker (no other open windows or distractions), I'll open 4 or so, and this helps me keep focused and concentrated on playing good poker. On the lower stakes people might go "wahhh wahh you aren't playing good poker, only the cards." This is true, but at the smallest level SNG + tourneys if you play the cards, chances are you'll do just fine. That's my 2 cents